Lumail
Product
Agents
PricingDocsChangelog
Log inSign up
← All comparisons

Lumail vs Iterable

vs
I

Lumail

Iterable

Enterprise AI customer engagement platform

Lumail and Iterable pricing and feature comparison

Free allowance

Lumail

$0

Iterable

No free plan

$0 · 3,000 emails · Unlimited subscribers

No free plan

Honest take

No public price. No free plan. You book a demo.

Journeys are the product. If you wanted a self-serve number, you're on the wrong page.

Paid entry

$20/month, 40,000 included, then $0.60/1,000

not publicly listed

Pricing basis

Unlimited subscribers; pricing follows email volume

Custom enterprise order with contracted usage limits for users, email/messages, custom events, catalog, journeys, and channels; overages…

Automation

Graph workflows with triggers, branches, goals, exits, and A/B paths

Journeys in Studio (formerly Workflows): start, message, delay, filter, user-update, and integration tiles; blast and…

AI and developer access

ChatGPT OAuth, MCP, skills, CLI, SDK, REST API, and visual editor

Nova Intelligence in-product (Agent, Decisioning, Insights). Open-source MCP server in beta (109 tools mapping to the REST API). No…

Transactional email

Included through API, SMTP, SDK, CLI, and agent tools

Yes, via transactional message channels and API-triggered campaigns. No customer SMTP relay documented.

Publishing surface

Capture pages and custom web domains; not a general website builder

Campaigns, templates, snippets, and catalogs. Not a hosted public newsletter or archive product.

Prices exclude taxes. Checked August 17, 2026. Can vary by billing interval, usage, currency, and add-ons.Iterable pricing

Choose Lumail if…

  • You want public self-serve pricing, unlimited subscribers, and volume-based email instead of a quote and annual usage commit
  • You want organization-scoped MCP plus a ChatGPT OAuth plugin, CLI, TypeScript SDK, and REST API as first-class operator surfaces
  • You need graph workflows and transactional email (API or smtp.lumail.io:587) in the same org, without SMS, push, or a CRM

Choose Iterable if…

  • You need one platform for email plus SMS, push, in-app, web push, WhatsApp, and OTT with marketer-owned Journeys
  • You are an enterprise B2C brand that wants Nova decisioning, predictive audiences, and a dedicated implementation/CSM motion
  • You already run a warehouse/CDP stack and want Smart Ingest, Data Sync, catalogs, and mobile/web SDKs wired into the engagement layer

Where Iterable is strong

A real alternative, not a straw man.

Sales-led cross-channel engagement suite (email, SMS, push, in-app, web push, WhatsApp, OTT) with Journeys, Nova Intelligence, and quote-based contracts. People pick Iterable when they need enterprise B2C brands that need real-time, cross-channel lifecycle messaging at scale with a sales-led implementation..

  • Native cross-channel orchestration: email, SMS/MMS, push, web push, in-app, embedded messages, WhatsApp, and OTT
  • Studio Journeys with branching, delays, profile updates, Live Data, and webhooks, plus blast and triggered campaigns
  • Nova Intelligence (Agent, send-time/channel/frequency decisioning, Brand Affinity, Predictive Goals) plus a documented REST API and SDKs

Don't trust the table. Run one journey.

Checklists lie by flattening the work. Build one real path: a trigger, a wait, a branch, a goal, an exit. Then open one subscriber and see what actually happened. That tells you more than any feature row.

  • 1. Import a small, consented sample. Not the whole list.
  • 2. Recreate one campaign and the audience it actually hits.
  • 3. Publish one automation with a goal you can measure.
  • 4. Fire a test and read every event on one person.
  • 5. Compare the weekly work, not the setup afternoon.
Lumail workflow run timeline showing each subscriber step and execution duration
Lumail exposes a subscriber-level trace, including the trigger, branch, email, goal, status, and execution time.

Try it on a real send

Keep the whole list. Pay when you send.

3,000 emails free, no card. Rebuild one campaign, one workflow, and one transactional message before you move anyone. If it feels worse than Iterable, stay.

Start freeSee full pricing

The questions people actually ask

Is Lumail cheaper than Iterable?

Sometimes. Lumail is $0 for 3,000 emails, then $20 for 40,000. Iterable's number only makes sense after you know what they cap: contacts, seats, a daily send limit, or a feature they hide behind a paid plan. Read the honest take above, then price a normal month and a launch month on both pages.

What is the main difference between Lumail and Iterable?

Choose Iterable when you need enterprise cross-channel lifecycle orchestration (email plus SMS, push, in-app, WhatsApp) under a custom annual contract. Choose Lumail when you want self-serve email priced by volume, unlimited subscribers, graph workflows, transactional SMTP/API in the same org, and organization-scoped MCP plus a ChatGPT plugin.

Can I migrate from Iterable to Lumail?

Yes. Don't move the whole list on day one. Export a small consented sample, rebuild one campaign and one automation, authenticate your domain, then watch one subscriber go through the run. If that feels right, move the rest.

Lumail

Email for creators and the agents that work for them. Campaigns, sequences and transactional, one domain.

Product
PricingChangelogDocumentationBlog
Compare
All comparisonsvs Mailchimpvs Klaviyovs HubSpotvs Kitvs Resend
Agents
All agentsChatGPTClaude CodeCodexMCP server
Developers
REST APISDKCLISMTP relay
Company
AboutSupportDashboardTermsPrivacy

8 The Green STE B, Dover Delaware 19901, United States

© 2026 Lumail.io · Codelynx, LLC. All rights reserved.